Comparison of environmental impacts of carrier bags from different materials

Authors

  • Vladimír Kočí VŠCHT Praha Ústav chemie ochrany prostředí Technická 5 CZ-166 28 Praha 6

Keywords:

Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Assessment, carrier bags

Abstract

Life cycle assessment of disposable paper, HDPE, LDPE bags and polyester and cotton textile bags is presented. The study looked at various life cycle scenarios of bags taking into account the different end-of-life cycle methods. These were landfilling, energy recovery and recycling. The bags were compared on the basis of the same functional unit, which was the delivery of 573 kg of purchase, which is the amount of the purchase that will be bought in one year by the average Czech household. The study also produced a variant based on the volume of the purchased purchase. It has been found that the highest environmental impacts are shown by LDPE low density polyethylene bags. On the contrary, the lowest environmental impacts were found with a polyester textile reusable bag. Paper bag with polyester bag in terms of environmental impacts does not match up to repeated 7-fold recycling of paper fiber. Scenarios involving landfilling and energy use of disposable LDPE, HDPE and paper bags have higher environmental impacts than textile bags designed for long-term use. It was also found that the environmental impacts of paper and HDPE carrying bags are comparable.

References

Bisinella, V.; Albizzati, P. F.; Astrup, T. F.; Damgaard, A., 2018. Life Cycle Assessment of grocery carrier bags (Miljoeprojekter No. 1985). Danish Environmental Protection Agency, København Ø.

ČNI, 2006a. ČSN ISO 14040 Environmentální management – Posuzování životního cyklu – Zásady a osnova. Český normalizační institut, Praha.

ČNI, 2006b. ČSN ISO 14044 Environmentální management – Posuzování životního cyklu – Požadavky a směrnice. Český normalizační institut, Praha.

ČSÚ, 2016. Vydání a spotřeba domácností statistiky rodinných účtů – 2016.

Edwards, C.; Fry, J. M., 2011. Life cycle assessment of supermarket carrierbags: a review of the bags available in 2006 (No. SC030148). Environment Agency, Bristol.

EU, 2015. Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a rady (EU) 2015/720 ze dne 29. dubna 2015, kterou se mění směrnice 94/62/ES, pokud jde o omezení spotřeby lehkých plastových nákupních tašek.

Goedkoop, M.; Heijungs, R.; Huijbregts, M. A. J.; De Schryver, A.; Struijs, J.; van Zelm, R., 2013. ReCiPe 2008 - A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level (No. I).

Huijbregts, M. A. J.; Steinmann, Z. J. N.; Elshout, P. M. F.; Stam, G.; Verones, F.; Vieira, M. D. M.; Hollander, A.; Zijp, M., 2017. ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 - A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level: Report I. Characterization (No. RIVM Report 2016-0104a). National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Kočí, V. (2018) “Comparison of environmental impacts of carrier bags from different materials”, ENTECHO, 1(2), pp. 7–11. Available at: https://entecho.cz/index.php/entecho/article/view/10-3260-entecho-2018-11-002 (Accessed: 21 November 2024).

Issue

Section

Peer reviewed articles