Comparison of environmental impacts of different types of yoghurt cups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35933/ENTECHO.2020.02Keywords:
Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Assessment, Packaging, Storage, Waste managementAbstract
The aim of the work was to assess the environmental impacts of different types of selected yoghurt cups made of different materials: plastic, paper, glass or composite material. Environmental impacts were assessed using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method.
The results of the work show that glass and composite packaging is worse than plastic packaging except for the impact category Resource use (mineral and metals) and Human toxicity. The best packaging appears to be plastic packaging with K3 decoration (paper), which has the smallest impacts in all evaluated impact categories. In the impact category Climate change, composite packaging and glass packaging have the greatest impact. The most affected category is Freshwater ecotoxicity. The highest impacts within this category are shown by glass packaging and subsequently composite packaging. In the impact category Ionizing radiation, the greatest impact has a glass packaging, then a composite packaging. Based on the results, it was determined that the main cause of the impacts of plastic cups is the production of PP granulate. In the case of glass packaging, it is the production of the glass itself, and in the case of composite packaging, the production of the composite packaging.
References
ČSÚ, 2018. Produkce, využití a odstranění odpadů, 2017. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/produkce-vyuziti-a-odstraneni-odpadu-2017
Dhaliwal, H.; Browne, M.; Flanagan, W.; Laurin, L.; Hamilton, M., 2014. A life cycle assessment of packaging options for contrast media delivery: comparing polymer bottle vs. glass bottle. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(12), 1965–1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0795-1
Dyer, T. D., 2014. Chapter 14 – Glass Recycling, In: Worrell, E.; Reuter, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Recycling. Elsevier, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396459-5.00014-3
Markwardt, S.; Wellenreuther, F.; Drescher, A.; Harth, J.; Busch, M., 2017. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Tetra Pak® carton packages and alternative packaging systems for liquid food on the Nordic market (Final Report). Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung, Heidelberg.
Smejtková, A., 2018. Balení v potravinářském průmyslu. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Praha.
Stichling, J.; Singh, R., 2012. LCA of Container Glass and comparison with PET, Beverage Carton, Pouch and Al Can.
Xie, M.; Qiao, Q.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, L., 2013. Life cycle assessment of composite packaging waste management—a Chinese case study on aseptic packaging. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0516-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Nikola Kráľová, Markéta Šerešová, Vladimír Kočí
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.